Interviu cu Arhiepiscop Lazar Puhalo – “erezia numita moralitate, stiinta si religia”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Interviu cu Arhiepiscop Lazar Puhalo – “erezia numita moralitate, stiinta si religia”

  1. Petre says:

    Aici sunt mai multe detalii despre cine este Lazar Puhalo: http://startingontheroyalpath.blogspot.com/2011/06/why-does-this-blog-list-lazar-puhalo-as.html

    Why does this blog list Lazar Puhalo as a “Not Safe Author”?
    When he was a deacon he was defrocked [not “deposed”] by Rocor in 1980 as a heretic. He has never repented, he’s only gotten worse.
    The following internet research on Puhalo was done by a Remnant Rocor team member:

    Exposé against Puhalo:

    This video is denouncing him for his condoning gay marriage, not really a complete expose as Puhalo has a lot of skeletons in his closet.

    Here’s some info from the Orthodox wiki about his defrockment by ROCOR.
    http://orthodoxwiki.org/Lazar_%28Puhalo%29_of_Ottawa

    I do remember reading something about him years ago saying Lazar Puhalo isn’t really his birth name but he had changed it to that so as to appear to be Serbian. I found this on OrthodoxChristianity.net about his name change ” The guy’s real name is Ron Haler IIRC”
    http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php?action=printpage;topic=11020.0

    This from a post on The Byzantine Forum …
    http://www.byzcath.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/216830/1
    Re: Check out the OCL conference [Re: Alice]
    Slavipodvizhnik
    Member
    Registered: 07/23/05
    Posts: 2298
    Loc: The Third Rome

    I am willing to be more blunt (surprise!).
    “Archbishop” Lazar Puhalo, aka defrocked Deacon Lev Puhalo, aka Ron Haler, is a well known “actor” in Orthodox circles. He was defrocked as a deacon and laicized by the Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia for teaching and propogating the heresy of “soul sleep”, despite numerous appeals and warnings to cease and desist. He immediatey made the rounds of various “schismatic” Orthodox Churches, amongst them being the “Free Serbian Orthodox Church”, The “Kieven Patriarchate” and the “Milan Synod”, all without canonical release from the ROCOR, and ordained priest and consecrated bihop uncanonically, being defrocked and laicized and under “epitemia”. He has been in more jurisdictions than Marie Presley has had husbands!

  2. Adrian.I says:

    @Petre
    Prietene, situl respectiv apartine unuia care este sub jurisdictia rocorului condus de Agaftanghel .
    Rocurul lui Agaftanghel nu este acelasi lucru cu ROCOR, adevarutul ROCOR a intrat de mult timp sub jurisdictia Moscovei, ce conduce Agaftanghel este un pseudo-sinod schismatic nerecunoscut de nici o patriarhie ortotodoxa. In schimb OCA de care apartine ips Lazar este in comuniune cu mai multe patriarhii. Agaftanghel si zelotii din “rocorul” disident au aceasta practica de a improsca cu noroi aproape in toti episcopii care au fost in rocor si care nu-i recunosc pseudo-sinoduletul schismatic nou creat. E interesant pana unde poate ajunge ipocrizia unora, cei din “rocorul” disident ii numeau eretici pana si pe Efrem Filotheitul sau Serafim Rose, monahi care sunt considerati sfinti aproape de toti ortodocsii, culmea este ca ei il acuza acum pe IPS Lazar ca-i contesta pe acestia ;))))), (o informatie falsa)ceea ce este deja culmea ipocriziei. Apoi incercarea de a justifica canonicitatea actuala a unui episcop prin apartenenta juridictionala din trecut este hilara, canonicitatea sa este data de jurisdictia prezenta.
    Legat de hirotonia necanonica a unor preoti si a unor episcopi, reamintesc ca aceasta practica era frecventa in randul multor ierarhi din rocorul autentic, chiar si Sf mitropolit Filaret intaistatatorul rocorului a facut ceva de genul, acestea sunt doar nereguli tipiconale, abateri jurisdictionale, nu teologice, astfel de lucruri gasesti cu duiumul si la marii parinti ca Sf Ioan Gura de Aur sau Sf Chiril al Alexandriei.
    Legat de condamnarea lui, ce spune respectivul e o mare prostie, condamnarea e sarcina sinodului, daca a fost condamnat de vechiul sinod si este primit in alt sinod atunci verificarea lui apartine noului sinod. anume OCA. Daca OCA il gaseste nevinovat are tot dreptul sa-l puna in functia de episcop, mitropolit s.a. Aceasta decizie poate fi contestata doar de patriarhiile care sunt in comuniune cu OCA, care nu au facut acest lucru ca dovada a ortodoxiei lui.De altfel disidentii schismatici din pesudo-sinoduletul lui Agaftanghel ar fi ultimii care ar putea contesta ortodoxia unui ierarh, acest lucru apartinand doar patriarhiilor si sinoadelor autentice ortodoxe.
    Apoi privind caterisirea lui, nu apar informatii care sa ne spuna daca a fost facuta de rocorul autentic, sau rocorul schismatic. In fine, daca un episcop provine dintr-o grupare schismatica, sau a fost cateristi de un sinod autentic, atunci hirotonia lui devine valabila prin iconomie chiar si numai prin mirungere(si chiar fara nimic , prin insasi comuniunea euharistica ,desi asa nu e prea corect dpdv tipiconal), daca este acceptat de un nou sinod ortodox , . Spre ex: pr Ghelasie de la Frasinei a fost hirotonit preot de stilistii de la BOSVR(sinod considerat schismatic) si a fost primit de BOR si numit ca preot doar prin mirungere, iar IPS Petru a fost caterisit de patriarhia Moscovei, insa a fost apoi acceptat si recunoscut ca mitropolit in BOR.

  3. Adrian.I says:

    @Petre
    “I do remember reading something about him years ago saying Lazar Puhalo isn’t really his birth name but he had changed it to that so as to appear to be Serbian. I found this on OrthodoxChristianity.net about his name change ” The guy’s real name is Ron Haler IIRC”

    Ce ai dat aici e o dovada de prostie crasa, orice ortodox stie ca in momentul intrarii in monahism calugarul trebuie sa-si schimbe numele de botez, primind un nou nume de calugarie.

    Si faza cu skeletii e stupida, multi monahi au practica de a tine skeleti/capi de morti, in sertar, pentru a le aminti de moarte, chiar si eu vreau sa-mi iau unu de plastic. Ce vad in linkurile alea e deja ingoranta dusa la extrema.Toate asa zisele “evidente” aduse impotriva sa sunt de-a dreptul stupide.

  4. SAR´GON says:

    cea mai mare erezie cum poate sa fie iconografia o imagine a ceiace este viu si supranatural., apoi in Romani Scriptura zice ca Dumnezeu a pus in om gandul vesniciei, si mantuirea se capata prin credinta in Domnul Isus Hristos nu prin SUROGATE……UITE DE ASTA A SPUS UN MARE TEOLOG NEOPROTESTANT CA ORTODOCSII NU AU O INVATATURA CURATA SI NICI CHIAR O TEOLOGIE SANATOASA IAAACHHH,,,,,

  5. Adrian.I says:

    Cum a putut Hristos sa fie o imagine a ceea ce este nematerial fara forma si vesnic?

  6. Iulian says:

    :)) Parintele Staniloaie a fost cica neoprotestant :))))) Iarta-i Doamne ca nu stiu ce vorbesc si nu cauta decat cearta.

  7. Adi says:

    (Osho) Today I received the news…. One of the most idiotic cults is the cult of HARE
    KRISHNA, HARE RAMA. I have come across every kind of idiot, but these two cults,
    the Witnesses of Jehovah and this movement of HARE KRISHNA, HARE RAMA —
    these are the worst idiots in the whole world! Now the Soviet Union has allotted them
    land to make a temple for Krishna.
    Now, these idiots… who are mostly American; not a single Hindu is involved in the
    Krishna movement. It is only the Americans, ex-hippies. I have even talked with their
    founder, Prabhupad, and he was such a senile idiot! But he managed to find other idiots
    to be followers.

  8. Have you ever thought about writing an e-book or guest authoring on other websites?
    I have a blog centered on the same topics
    you discuss and would really like to have you share
    some stories/information. I know my readers would appreciate your
    work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me
    an email.

  9. Silver Chain says:

    Hmm it seems like your blog ate my first comment (it was super
    long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say,
    I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I as well am an aspiring
    blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any points for inexperienced blog writers?
    I’d definitely appreciate it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s